MBDA
... Missiles, Bombs
and Deadly Ammunition? |
Northern
Friends Peace Board
Challenging
Militarism Project
Signpost
leaflet - March 2003
(click here for
PDF version, 28KB)
|
When we hear about the huge arms
company, BAE Systems, in the news media, it is normally in connection
with major aircraft or ship-building contracts. But what makes
such equipment so deadly is what they carry. Without their
ordnance, they are simply expensive vehicles. With it, they are
instruments equipped to deliver death, damage and injury to military
and civilians alike.
And this is where MBDA comes
in...
MBDA is the acronym for the
merged European missile production company, its full name being Matra
BAE Dynamics Alenia. Formed in 2000, it consists of parts of BAE
Systems (in the UK), Finmecannica (in Italy), and EADS (European
Aeronautic Defence and Space Company).
In Britain MBDA has bases in
Stevenage (research and production), Bristol (research) and at Lostock
in Bolton (production).
What MBDA produces
Amongst other things…
- Air-to-air missiles such as
the Meteor
(“To ensure total target destruction, the
missile is equipped with both proximity and impact fuzes and a
fragmentation warhead that is detonated at the optimum point to
maximise lethality” - quotation from MBDA press pack) - Ground-to-air missiles such as Jernas
(“… fully automatic and easy to use and
maintain 24 hours a day in all weather…”) - Anti-tank weapons such as Kestrel
(“..small, lightweight and easy to use and
will provide an unprecedented mix of lethality and mobility.”) - Cruise missiles such as Storm Shadow
(“…capable of very high precision in the
final phase and with high destructive power.”) - Sea-launched missiles such as Exocet
(“…in production since 1972, and has
achieved 93% hits demonstrated by customers.”)
In Bolton, local MPs have lobbied
the Ministry of Defence to ensure that key contracts come the way of
the MBDA plant in Lostock. But recent studies have shown that,
whilst the arms industry and government argues that it is good for the
economy, it is in fact heavily subsidised … see our earlier leaflet on
‘Do Quakers support the arms trade?’.
Remember
The term ‘fire and forget’ is used
widely in MBDA publicity materials to describe the nature of their
missiles. It seems - rather like ‘collateral damage’ -
designed to encourage us to ignore the reality that the effects of
missiles and bombs is deadly. Targets, structures, bases,
command-and-control centres, communications facilities ... all these
things tend to have people in and around them. It may be easier
to try to forget such a fact when firing a missile from a high-speed
jet but occasionally in recent wars, the public has been given glimpses
of the human cost.
Commercial prospects
A Rand Commission report in 2002
stated that missiles are expected to be a real growth area for arms
manufacturers throughout the world. Will we then be told that we
have to develop more sophisticated weaponry to defend ourselves from
the missiles that we and other arms manufacturing countries have sold
to ‘rogue’ nations in future years? Is this really a responsible
way forward?
Missile ‘defence’
MBDA has been involved in
undertaking research into the possibilities of a ballistic missile
defence system for Nato. Perhaps more significantly, its
component companies have reached agreements with US arms company Boeing
to work on the US missile ‘defense’ programme. They clearly have
much to gain, if the US were to award contracts to them, and will no
doubt be using any opportunities they can to seek to influence their
own and the US government to engage them in this way.
Members of the House of Commons
Defence Select Committee seemed keen for work of this sort to come to
the UK, in their recent consideration of the US request to use
Fylingdales for missile defense. Is this really the best way of
deciding how to build peace and security in the world?
| Action ideas
MBDA is just one cog in an
increasingly complex machine that makes up the international arms
industry. It is important that, as active citizens, we find out
about the kind of things that are going on in our own backyards,
subsidised by our taxes. Here are just a few suggestions.
- If you have web access,
spend some time searching (with search engines such as Google) for information about the
activities of your local arms manufacturer (MBDA’s site is at: http://www.mbda.net) . The
archives of local papers can also be good sources of information.
- Contact Campaign
Against Arms Trade (CAAT) for information they have on the company, and
find out if there are ways in which you can use their resources and
expertise to raise the issues locally. Campaign Against Arms
Trade, 11 Goodwin Street, London, N4 3HQ tel: 020
7281 0297 fax: 020 7281 4369
Web: www.caat.org.uk
- Contact other groups
and individuals in the community – and perhaps the local press –
asking them to consider the morality and economic soundness of the arms
industry.
- Link up with other
groups of concerned citizens through CAAT and Quaker networks to share
ideas and perhaps arrange joint activities and acts of witness.
- Consider holding silent
vigils outside bases, or other forms of visible witness. Quaker
Peace & Social Witness have produced a simple pack with ideas for
vigils – copies available from the NFPB office – see address below.
- Contact senior managers
in the company or other employees, to see if there is scope for
dialogue. Use the Oxford Research Group booklet on ‘Everyone's
guide to achieving change’ (via the NFPB office), or invite NFPB to run
a workshop on dialogue skills if you would like support for this type
of activity.
|
|
Northern Friends Peace Board
Victoria Hall, Knowsley Street, Bolton
BL1 2AS
Ph: 01204 382330 E:
nfpb@gn.apc.org W: www.gn.apc.org/nfpb
|
|